Mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 227:2

ואיכא דאמרי

Another version runs as follows: There is no dispute at all that for the cooking he certainly incurs stripes they differ only with regard to the eating thereof: he who says he does not incur stripes contends that a prohibition cannot be superimposed upon an existing prohibition, and he who says he incurs stripes contends that for this very reason did the Divine Law express the prohibition of eating by the term 'cooking' [to signify that] whenever a man incurs stripes for the cooking he likewise incurs stripes for the eating thereof.

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 227:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.